The Better prime Minister of Canada
Introduction
Around 2006 and 2015 harper served as Canada’s 22nd Premier. He became the first prime minister of the new Canadian Conservative Party. The 2006 national election led to a minority government under Harper which was Canada’s longest ministry. It is found that the party had lost a majority and thus lost its popularity, which led to the creation of Harper’s system of control (Goebel 18). Harper was associated with vices such as bribery, prejudice, and financial plundering amid his insight into contemporary conservationist thought. He nevertheless kept an appeal as close as 35%. Upon resumption of office in the eleventh month of 2015 by Treadue, the electorates expected an end to the fatiguing regime of Harper. Based on his family affiliations to his further alongside his compelling promising speeches, Treadue was seen as a transformative leader. He has however been affiliated to little completion rates of his promises. As a result, some electorates believe that Treadue is not a suitable leader while others rate him as the best prime minister of their time. This paper thus takes a comparative presentation of Harper and Treadue regimes to indicate why Treadue rates better than Harper.
Harper was a threat to Canada
Harper has taken the wonderful Country that has proud people to one that instigates criminality almost every day. Canada no longer had a parliamentary system able to operate in Westminster. The enviable image abroad was reduced to rubble when Alberta’s economy was focused 100 percent on mining and exporting tar sands and other raw materials without spending on infrastructure or major value-adding industries. Unemployment also grew when a secret police service was created and freedom of speech ceased to exist. As Harper followed a Bush-like scheme to give the wealthy, the middle class drowned (Jain 99). In a relentless attack on democratic systems, he never spoke to the Canadian public or to the press, but rather to American trade groups all his proclamations and left his lackeys in his utter lack to insult parliament.
About 35 percent like him, at minimum enough then to vote for him, to bring some balance to that view. Their justifications are usually one of two matters: all they care about is tax breaks and he always pledges that delivery is another matter. They presume his propaganda, at least if you are not rich, about his ability to be a good steward. After the financial crisis of 9, Harper recognized the strength of Canada, but it was in fact policies he opposed that had been set up before him by governments (Demchuk 100). Despite a budget surplus, Harper began his reign.
He spent something, then some, and now based his campaigns on the overarching need to tighten the citizens’ belts and reduce his own deficit. The Canadians who voted for him were not very educated politically and didn’t quite understand what he did in that region. We just learned “deficit = evil” and assumed that Harper’s economics degree made him the best guy to solve it. Harper was the Bush II variety’s neo-con. His plan was to dismantle the state by famishing it with income and power.
Treadue the best since 1968
His vision of a more conservative government and a smaller country tended to be played down. Instead, he supported a transactional, radical approach that worked hard to appear dangerous. Harper sought to avoid getting more publicity than it required except to flood the nation with the “Economic Action Plan” billboards. The attitude of Trudeau was almost the opposite. He was loud and popular. He embraced “the vision thing.” He made wider appeals to ideas and ideals, as much as he pledged to do particular things.
The liberal agenda for 2015 includes three hundred and fifty-three pledges, as per a count by researchers at the University of Laval. Such a study examined four years later that 189 (54%) commitments were held in full, while 136 (39%) fulfilled partly. The campaigns he initiated and directed were in line with the language of ideas: transformation, unity, diversity, feminism and sexual equality, accountability, and openness, “sunny ways.” He was declared to be the right leader as highlighted by Supyan on page 7 in this dangerous moment (especially in the pages of American magazines).
The first prime minister ever to frequent a gay bar is assumed to be Trudeau marching in parades. During open city council meetings, he responds to questions from the general public. He described himself as a feminist and named the same amount in his cabinet for men and women. He appeared on Vogue pages and on Rolling Stone’s cover (Essén e20). Those are not or should not have done Stephen Harper.
The married couples’ income division has been eliminated and the federal child care program has been revamped and extended. It has restored the long-form census. Canadian businesses are now obliged to report publicly on the number of their managers’ women. Because of “in all your sons’ command, the national anthem read. Many Senate seats are republicans. The national anthem now says ‘in all of us command’ given legal challenges initiated by 3 conservative premiers, there is a national carbon price which is perceived to have been “one of the world’s most aggressive schemes for carbon pricing.”
Setbacks of Treadeu
Here accumulated questions surfaced about Trudeau locally from the rapid withdrawal of his campaign commitment to proportional representation to his odd fascination with fancy dress and concern over the sincerity of his progressive credentials.
However, two special events were crucial for his progressive brand to be reversed. Firstly, his government purchased $4.5 billion from the US-based Kinder Morgan trans-mountain pipeline (Gorman 40). With environmentalists and society, First Nations it will go through this was extremely controversial. The question raised was the commitment of Trudeau to address climate change and to help indigenous populations as well.
Firstly, his government tried to bring the Québec-based engineering firm SNC-Lavalin to an end to criminal trials for international malfeasance. That led to the renunciation of the cabinet of the first Native Minister of Justice of Canada, Jody Wilson Raybould. She whined that she had been forced to allow the SNC-Lavalin postponement of litigation and that another female minister, Jane Philpott, should follow in unity in her departure from the cabinet.
Both were then removed from the Liberal party after ending a controversy that challenged Trudeau’s commitment to sustainable governance, women’s equality, and aboriginal leadership. Also, progressive voters were surprised by the appearance of campaign photos of a younger blackface Trudeau. The images, both in Germany and abroad, were decisively tarnished.
Although the challenges of Trudeau may seem shocking, his government’s failure to tackle significant systemic and revenue disparities in Canada really follows a trend of fracturing almost every other mainstream democracy’s political climate (Carment 120). Trudeau has little support as he has a family name and legacy that is a sign of privilege, in a world where disparity of wealth and nepotism are divisive.
An analogy of Treadue and Harper
The recession, strength, and introversion of Harper gradually hit such numbers of people that the Trudeau victory was preset after almost ten years. Trudeau was accepted by Keystone XL in the United States for its final leg. Moreover, the Northern Gateway was determined by him. Yes, it was a pessimistic judgment, and that was too bad, but the fast “no” every time better than Harper’s long-drawn “perhaps.”
Let’s overlook that Trudeau has been licensed for twinning in Trans-mountain. If children Morgan did not act fast enough, the government of Trudeau purchased the Trans-mountain pipeline and confirmed the twinning funding. As promised, in preparation for higher tanker traffic, he increased the capacity for environmental rebuttal on the west coast: Harper definitely cut capacity. Stephen Harper used the parliament suspended at least three occasions during his rule: to prevent a vote of no confidence in Afghanistan first and then to prevent sensible questions.
In fact, Stephen Harper has been identified with politicians like Putin and Adolf Hitler who can tune their countries’ democratic systems to their will. Harper has been involved with crimes like Chuck Cadman’s bribery, his perjuries about that, Dona Cadman’s bribery and election fraud (Jain 95). He also claimed to indulge his disgusting and unusual effort to annihilate indigenous politics and questioned the UN convention on the rights of indigenous peoples in the criminal prosecution of opposition members against a very ordinary Westminster Coalition. Revelatory policy defiance included his denial of climate change and deliberate destruction of research in the Arctic and ocean and its deliberate destruction of the integrity of the census.
Conclusion
The question of the viability of Treadue and Harper in terms of the best prime minister attracts mixed reactions. It is essentially diverse the fact that harper served a longer term of nine years as compared to the Treadues five at stake. Considering the policy and modality of administration is however a promising determinant of who takes the day. It is noted that Harper joined Canada’s administration through a conservative party which actually ended up in conservative ideologies. He would rather protect his reputation through non-engagement than promising his electorate’s progressive policies like climatic changes and economic security. Besides he was associated with egocentric politics that diminished economic stability as well as advanced corruption. Treadue on the contrary has been less identified to his father: Pierre’s modality of administration that formed a framework for the development of Canada. Having garnered a rate of 54% accomplishment of his promises, however, identifies him as a great achiever. The aspect is further enhanced due to his vocal and diversified promises in economic and international matters.