One of the trending topics is the Vice Presidential debate between Kama Harris, the current senator of California, and the current vice president Mike Pence.
According to the New York Times, the debate should not have taken place at all. The magazine states that given the continued Corona Virus outbreak in the Whitehouse, an in-person discussion was outright wrong. While the Vice president tested negative for the Virus, CDDC guidelines dictate that individuals who have come into close contact with an infected person; defined as being within six feet for a maximum of 15 minutes or more. Starting from two days before the onset of the disease manifestations or give appositive outcome should be quarantined for at least two weeks even if they end testing negative. The New York’s article further contents that while the debate involved Plexiglas as a safety measure, numerous medical practitioners stated that they would have everything possible to protect Ms. Harris in the scenario that Mr. Pence was positive, given that COCVID-19 is airborne. Linsey Marr, an environmentalist and an engineering instructor at Virginia Tech contents, an expert in airborne infections, decried the debates set up.
The New York Times further states that Ms. Harris and the vice president both made notable deflections. While politicians are wont, Ms. Harris took part in mild overstatement and rhetorical flourishes, but the Vice president was by a mile far more dishonest. In the course of the interview, the vice p[resident is seen to want to run on a record that is nonexistent, not only giving false information about personal attainments but going a mile further by misrepresenting Mr. Biden. The vice president also changed the topic numerous times at a given time. He was tasked with a difficult question. At some point, he avoided the question of whether the current federal administration had a tangible plan to deal with the Coronavirus and existing medical conditions if it voided the ACA. It does not.
Notable global media houses and magazines such the New York Times, the Chicago Tribune, and
Russian NTV content that the vice presidential debate was more than who won than the differences it brought to fore. The candidate’s gender, heritage, ideology, and outlook on the global COVID-19 pandemic were both symbolically differentiated by the Plexiglas put up the
COVID-19 control measure. According to Russian NTV, such health control measures in an enclosed space was nothing but fun. Everything separated the two from a plexiglass barrier, an evangelical conservative from the Midwest, and a mixed-race Californian woman.
The Chicago tribune contents that the debate wa sharp in the matter but polite in tone. The newspaper contents that the debate was by far different from the first presidential candidate debate that took place in September. There was an urge for presidential behavior. While the first presidential debate appalled many Americans, which seemed like domestic fighting instead of a presidential debate, this was by far civil. The media outlets focused on how the democratic candidate fared, while she was less spirited than expected
they highlight her criticism of President Trump from withdrawing from Iran’s nuclear deal and her remark that the
the United States is more isolated under president Trump.