Responses
Hello Shooq Hussain A Alzahrani
This is an excellent insight concerning the information Security Objective framework in differentiating the various types of these frameworks. You have keenly stated how the management of CobiT 5 applied in two perspectives. Your explanation of how the risk function perspective explains the necessities in building and sustaining a well-organized and operative core risk governance and organization undertaking is within the discussion’s adherence. I will only like to add one concept concerning the CobiT 5 that its designation is made to be a supportive tool for managers as it reduces the between technical issues, business risks, and control requirements. In most cases, it is preferably recognized as a guideline that can be applied to any organization in any industry.
Secondly, in your discussion on question 4b, you have given a good talk on SABSA as a model developed in six layers: contextual layer, conceptual layer, Logical layer, physical layer, the component layer, and the operational layer. You have shown how it gives a comprehensive data structure, which is vital in ensuring effective and successful management. The sixth layer is operations security architecture, whose purpose for leadership is to ensure continuity of commercial systems while still upholding the safety of working retail data and information.
In your question 4c discussion, you have deeply explained how the six layers layer component offers comprehensive data arrangements, the safety standards need, safety products and tools, and characteristics. This discussion was so extensive and covered all the relevant information on the information security objective framework.
Finally, in question 4d discussion, you have given a clear relationship between risk, business risk, and cybersecurity by accurately defining their purpose with relevance to business applications such as SWOT analysis. Also, note that we can use standards and certification tests to promote risk analysis as a type of ordinal scoring method. Besides, this will include continuous testing and updating of the company’s computers and data stores’ security settings.
Hello Alexander Guttmann
I agree with you on every informative insight you have given on the information Security Objective framework and a thorough description of the Capability Maturity Model, COBIT, and SABSA. You have explained how the Capability Maturity Model is a methodology used to develop and refine an organization’s software development process.
On question 4b, you have furtherly explained how the model uses a five-level evolutionary path of increasingly organized and systematically more mature processes. I want to add on your insights the designation of the COBIT framework, which is always designated to be a supportive tool for managers as it reduces the between technical issues, business risks, and control requirements. In most cases, it is preferably recognized as a guideline that can be applied to any organization in any industry. I concurrently agree with your definition and explanation on SABSA as a tested methodology used for developing business-orientated risk in addition to COBIT explanation. Kindly add that SABSA strategy, objectives, relationships, risks, constraints, and all enabling factors are indicators of the sort of security architecture the organization needs.
In question 4c, you have carefully illustrated how Logical Architecture centers on Knowledge Release & Deployment Management are needed for Risk Modeling, Development, Maintenance, Supply Chains, Financial Management, and Transition Management.
Finally, on question 4d, your definition and explanation of how risk is any threat or danger in the business organization and describing business assets’ taxonomy, including goals and objectives. SWOT analysis is keenly attributed to the fact that third party auditing is the two best ways to analyze threats and opportunities throughout the organization. SWOT is designed to catalog risk and opportunities while third-party auditing can be used to discover gaps and oversight in the organization, and generally, you covered the most insightful contents