Mele uses Categorical logic to infer that free will, through the lens of Benjamin Libet’s experiment, is mostly an unconscious decision that we have no little part in. This categorical logic that he explains using the science of neurobiology tests whether decision making stems from the conscious or the unconscious part of the brain. That is to say that every decision man makes is made in his subconscious, which he has no idea, and although he shows this part, he also contends that this categorical thinking can be divided into free will and free “won’t. Hence, in his assumption, free will is available to every person as there is always the process of “vetoing in the mind which gives people the room to make conscious decisions and hence free will is existent (8). Vetoing is the time lapse between the first EGG –Libet uses this to test electrical impulses in the brain when testing decision making.
Mele uses Categorical Syllogisms to show that free will enables determinism, which is the equivalent that every person has the power to deploy free will as long as they have the determination. As the author shows, ‘…its just a way, the universe is” (34). Hence for categorical syllogisms, the author combines the conscious and conscious elements of biology through neuroscience to say that free will is often accessible and available for people. Of the four categorical logic, Mele uses good intentions to show that people often have the conscious implementation intention (45). This is because all human actions are mostly caused in the same way. In other words, when a person decides to do well, their mind is open and allowed to perform in decision making, which means that other decisions prior made have an impact on the current situation. Free will, therefore, according to Mele, is available for everyone since factors such as determinism will influence actions such as good intentions..