Big Five Personality Traits
Author Names
Institution
Course Name and Number
Instructor’s Name
Assignment Due Date
Big Five Personality Traits
The big five traits result from many researchers coming together and over 4500 terms related to personality traits. As such, the psychologist can determine the dimensions of personalities through the results submitted. From 16 traits narrowed down by Allport, psychologists further narrowed the traits into five categories to cover primal personality factors (Gosling et al., 2003). As such, the big five personalities has been widely accepted across different cultures and population as the recommended personality categorization. Consequently, each personality trait represented carries personality-related terms. This paper will briefly discuss the big five personality traits and describe my personality under the big five traits.
Conscientiousness
Conscientiousness trait describes a person’s ability to regulate their impulse when faced with goal-oriented situations. The trait measure measures the persistence of individuals in factors such as inhibition control and persistence of behavior. Features of conscientiousness trait may either be high or low. High conscientiousness traits include competence deliberation, self-discipline, dutifulness, organization, and achievement striving (Sorić, Penezić, & Burić, 2017). On the other hand, low conscientiousness involves Incompetence, disorganization, indiscipline, impulsiveness, and frostiness. Consequently, some people score high and low in the consciousness trait
Agreeableness
Agreeableness traits focus on people’s orientation and interaction with the outside world. Unlike extraversion, which consists of pursued relationships, agreeableness highlights how individuals treat a relationship with others. Those with agreeableness traits may display characters such as straightforwardness, trust, empathy, sympathy, altruism, compliance, and modesty. People with antagonism traits display personality traits such as skeptical showing off, demanding, Insulting or belittling others, unsympathetic stubborn, and doesn’t care how the others feel (Oshio, Taku, Hirano, & Saeed, 2018). Individuals might portray antagonistic tendencies in their interaction with others, leading to them being less likable and trusted by others.
Extraversion
Extraversion refers to the intensity and tendency of individuals seeking interaction with the social environment. The trait focuses on the comfort and assertiveness of people in different situations socially. Moreover, extraversion detects channels in which individuals draw energy to interact socially. Extraversion personality traits include: sociable, energized by social interaction, outgoing, excitement seeking from the social environment, and enjoys being the center of attention (Sorić, Penezić, & Burić, 2017). On the other hand, the flip side of extraversion- introversion involves individuals who are reserved fatigued by social interactions with others, disliking the center of attention in a social gathering. Most individuals in this category prefer solitude. Introverts mostly prefer solitude to regain their energy, as attending to social events might be tiring to them. Notably, introverts do not dislike social gatherings, and the reason they do not attend them is because of their tiring nature.
Openness to Experience
Openness to experience refers to an individual’s ability to learn new things while engaging in imaginative and intellectual activities. In common terms, it is known as the ability to think out the box. People with this type of experience exhibit personality traits such as curiosity, creativity, imaginative, open to learning new things, and are usually unconventional. On the other hand, people who are closed to experience personality traits such as predictability, traditional, dislikes change, not imaginative, and mostly prefer routines (Gosling et al., 2003). Moreover, close to experience, people find it difficult to think as they are used to handling tasks traditionally.
Neuroticism
Neuroticism describes an individual’s emotional stability on how they perceive the world. Consequentially, the trait defines how a person may respond to life-threatening events they encounter. How an individual can control negative emotions defines a higher sense of neuroticism. Some of the high neuroticism senses include anxiety, self-consciousness, anger, stress experience, experience to dramatic shifts, and moods. On the other hand, people with emotional stability experience calmness, confidence, and resilience and rarely feel sad or depressed (Oshio, Taku, Hirano, & Saeed, 2018). As a result, people with emotional stability are more likely to have higher self-esteem than people with high neuroticism.
My big five personality Traits
I have high conscientiousness as I view myself as a competent individual with self-discipline. I participate in athletics and marathon, making me more striving and competent to improve my performance daily after practice and competitions. Moreover, I display a high level of the agreeable trait, as many of my friends trust me. My working colleagues and boss appreciate my modesty and straightforwardness in the working environment. I am an extrovert as I enjoy a lot spending most of my free time with friends out in public. I am naturally adventurous, which gives me a platform to interact with the public. I am curious to learn new things and create new ideas, which gives me the openness to experience. However, I have high neuroticism, as I am always anxious when I face life-threatening situations. When things do not go my way stressed out or depressed.
In conclusion, the big five personality traits play an important role in understanding the individual categorization of personalities. Most of the traits are stabilized in the developmental stage of individuals. As such, adults are more likely to possess defined traits than children or adolescents. Factors that influence traits might vary from nature to nurture, including health, gender, relationship education, and work.
References
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann Jr, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in personality, 37(6), 504-528.
Oshio, A., Taku, K., Hirano, M., & Saeed, G. (2018). Resilience and Big Five personality traits: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 127, 54-60.
Sorić, I., Penezić, Z., & Burić, I. (2017). The Big Five personality traits, goal orientations, and academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 126-134.