Being intentional when giving feedback
Displaying intent is the quality of making known the reasons for your writing to the audience. This is important to assist the reader know what precisely the author intends to pass to them. In this case, it would be crucial to be clear about the changes that would be made in the prospectus so that the literature should not be subject to misinterpretation (Farrell 2017). To minimise the possibilities of misunderstanding, the following minimums would be achieved. Firstly, appropriate use of graphical images or visual aids, such as charts, should be included where possible. Also, one can employ evidence presented as figures so that the team can relate them to the findings. It is also essential to use professional language to confine the attention of the reader to the prospectus report only. The inclusion of previous works and external statements would also help add credibility to the research (Brandoff 2018). IT would also be useful to incorporate most if not all of the feedback from the content expert and the faculty chair into the final issue of the prospectus and have these recommendations reflect in the whole article where possible. Lastly, it would be responsible for sending follow-up questions and considering the inputs from the same besides reviewing other sources for clarification of whatever is being done.
Searching for articles to add to the prospectus
The following steps would be followed in to search for relevant articles; developing a search strategy successfully, that would include fully defining the topic of study, which in this case happens to be on quality improvement. It would then be necessary to identify the databases; either electronic or physical libraries where information is hosted. In the case of use of an electronic database, it would be of great significance to develop the most suitable keywords that would yield the appropriate resources. It would then be required to create restrictions unto the search parameters then design the means to record the retrieved information. The yielded sources would include journals, theses and dissertations, conference literature, government policies among others (Internal staff guide 2013). A review of these sources would be necessary so their relevance can be concluded upon. When conducting the review process, it is essential that the author applies critical appraisal skills and principles of analysis to identify useful sources. The literature review should identify areas of controversy and help formulate questions that would require further research whole summarising on areas that are both known or those that are not yet studied.
Essential elements of academic writing and ways to improve
Crucial factors in a university assignment include a thesis which are the main ideas for the task and the propositions and theory which would later be backed up with evidence from credible sources. Another crucial element of academic writing is a motive. The student might want to state the purpose of the essay, which is in most cases addressed by the questions presented. The mission would enable the reader get interested to know the thesis being directed by the student. The motive should be genuine, and the definition of the reason should be limited only to the initial paragraphs. Key terms are also essential elements to include and observe in an academic essay. Keyes is the recursive ideas or oppositions, upon where the arguments are based. Key terms should be clear and should be included multiply within the article. For argumentative essays, evidence and an analysis of the evidence should proceed the premises. Finally, the project should include references from where the student did derive their findings.