American court system
Question one answer.
As a student studying criminal justice in college, I cannot let the chance to participate in jury hearing pass me. It is a priceless experience and exposure to criminal law and the practice of my civic right in defining the fate of the defendant. As much as I do not want to miss my lectures this semester, I guess missing them for the right course is worth it. I will make a good schedule for my classes and liaise with my professors to get the lecture notes later. I do not want to mess with the jury in deciding the fate of the woman who is convicted of shoplifting, so I will take time to study the defendant’s legal rights. Before giving any comment or suggestion to the jury, I will research and think critically about it- do not want to be removed from the jury pool. I will also be keen to know all the evidence against the defendant. And the principle guidelines provided by the judge.
Question two answer
The opinions in a supreme court are legal opinions written down by the judicial panel or the judge in the course of a legal hearing or resolving a legal dispute. It provides the decision that will be used in determining the conflict and indicates facts that caused the dispute and law analysis used in concluding. There are three prominent judicial opinions in a supreme court: majority opinion, concurring opinion, and dissenting opinion. There are different opinions in the supreme court because each statement gives a different view of the law and plays an essential role in the convicted’s final judgment. The majority opinion expresses why the court made a specific decision in a particular case. A concurring opinion agrees with the majority opinion’s conclusion but makes a specific point in the decision that the majority opinion had left out in their decision making. A dissenting opinion disagrees with the decision of the majority opinion.
Question three answer
Jury selection is the choice of the people who will serve as a jury in a jury trial. The potential candidates for the jury pool are first selected randomly from the community using a reasonable method. The jury list is compiled from ID renewals, driver licenses, and voter registration. Summonses are mailed from the jury list. Prospective jurors are selected randomly for a sitting in the jury box. They are put to questioning by the United States attorneys and the judge in court. The attorney can mount a challenge to the prospect jury to argue the cause. But it depends on the jurisdiction of the attorney. Where there is the involvement of capital sentence, the prospects opposed to the death penalty are removed-death-qualified jury is required. The attorney can sometimes use assistance from experts to choose the jury systematically. The selected jury is said to have been empaneled.
Question four answer
The right to counsel is the right for a convicted person or criminal defendant to have a lawyer who can help them defend their course. Even when the criminal defendant cannot afford a lawyer, the constitution gives them the right to have one during federal prosecutions, so the government should provide one. A Strickland standard test is done to ensure that the defendant has received the right to counsel effectively. The attorney’s performance must be adequate; the representation in a court proceeding must be sufficient and fair-without prejudice. No possibility of proceeding’s results being differed.