Why Abortion Should Be Legal and Its Benefits
Mølland, E. (2016). Benefits from delay? The effect of abortion availability on young women and their children. Labor Economics, 43, 6-28.
Although there is so much information about the arrival of the contraceptive pill on women’s outcomes and fertility, there has been limited research on abortion availability implications. In his study, abortion was presented to women within week 12 of their gestation period in Oslo before the Rest of Norway knew about it. The article is vital for this research because it indicates that abortion availability played a delaying role in infertility, but it played no significant role in reducing completed family size. Moreover, the article concludes by stating that abortion results in increased educational attainment levels, and children of mothers whose parents engaged in abortion have better outcomes. The article is reliable and credible because an expert in Labor Economics writes it.
Levine, P. B. (2004). Abortion policy and the economics of fertility. Society, 41(4), 79-85.
The discussion on abortion entails matters of ethics, religion, philosophy, and feminism.AS such, the questions about women’s rights and where the life begins possess an important role in establishing one’s position concerning rules and regulations governing access to abortion. However, it is rare to see a debate on abortion, focusing on its economic benefits or standpoint. This article is essential because t offers insights on the economic tantrum surrounding abortion and its benefits. For the large numbers involved, abortion can assess maintaining legality since society realizes the benefits of women. The article is vital because experts write it in economics; hence they can relate the economic benefits involved with the legality of abortion.
Blackshaw, B. P., & Rodger, D. (2020). Questionable benefits and unavoidable personal beliefs: defending conscientious objection for abortion. Journal of Medical Ethics, 46(3), 178-182.
Conscientious objection has received a lot of criticism in recent years on two grounds. First, it involves a refusal to offer a beneficial and legal procedure under the patient’s request, which hampers their access to healthcare. Second, it is based on unsubstantiated facts and personal beliefs. As a result, these issues disqualify the applicability of conscientious objection in medical practice. This article is crucial because it defends conscientious objection based on the provision f abortion. It indicates that abortion posses a dubitable claim to medically advantageous, and it is rarely shown that it should be accepted under such circumstances. The dependence on personal belief in some way is difficult to evade if any objection form is allowed. Even if it focuses on the profession’s values and principles or professional practice scope, it should be allowed.
Tasset, J., & Harris, L. H. (2018). Harm reduction for abortion in the United States. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 131(4), 621-624.
In the United States, accessibility to abortion has eroded to a large extent. Besides, there is an advocacy movement focusing on empowering women n engaging in self-induced abortion. As a result, the roles and responsibilities of physicians in this changing paradigm have to be noted. This article explores the harm reduction technique for first-trimester abortion as an avenue for physicians and nurses to honor mortal and clinical obligations to care for women, support women, and make discussions for ever-growing abortion legalities. The article indicates that harm curbing techniques have been set in various countries and focus on educating women on misoprostol use. Whenever they self-administer it instead of using other techniques such as abdominal trauma or self-instrumentation, the mortality rate reduces. This article is essential because it identifies ethical and clinical benefits and limitations of using a harm-curbing technique in America. Yet, its legal effect on physicians and patients is unclear.
Fiala, A. (2019). Legal but Rare: Toward a Transformative Critical Theory of Abortion and Unwanted Pregnancy. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 33(2), 203-220.
The article commences by indicating that it is incoherent for many individuals to believe that abortion should be legal but rare. It concentrates its argument on the virtue of critical theory, feminism, ethical values, and the theoretical frameworks of biopolitics to showcase that this ideology should best be comprehended as aiming at eliminating unwanted pregnancies. In some instances, pro-choice see the stigmatization effect of this statement on women who prefer having an abortion. Yet, when this ideology is unpacked using biopolitical theory, intersectional analysis tools, and virtue ethics, it is comprehended as pointing towards a transformation of social reality capable of empowering women.
Ziegler, M. (2020). Abortion in America: Roe v. Wade to the Present. Cambridge University Press
With an increased likelihood that the Supreme Court will reverse its decision in Roe V, Wade focuses on the abortion decision. There is a debate fixated on classing and contradicting rights. The book focuses on the first clear legal history of a crucial timeline in Supreme Court law and abortion and illuminates an unexpected and different shift concerning the3 debate. As opposed to merely championing rights, individuals on the opposing sides battled on the benefits and the policy costs of law and abortion. In doing so, it deepened polarization in avenues many individuals have missed. Never go against their constitutional rights, pro-life and pro-choice advocates increasingly disagreed n the fundamental facts.
Fetrow, K. L. (2018). Taking Abortion Rights Seriously: Toward a Holistic Undue Burden Jurisprudence. Stan. L. Rev., 70, 319.
Abortion accessibility by women remains e of the most contested right and legal issues in America. Based on the current constitutional indications, an abortion regulation is unconstitutional based on the 14th amendment, especially f under any circumstance. It imposes an undue burden on an individual’s liberty to abortion. The article goes ahead to argue that determining if the responsibility is under confounds courts and legislatures alike. Moreover, literature and scholarly articles have mostly concentrated on providing critiques on the standard instead of debating how the current standards should be applied and understood. This article is crucial for this research since it offers insights into the growing debate on abortion’s legality of abortion.
Kim, C. J. (2020). Conscientious objection to abortion: why it should be a specified legal right for doctors in South Korea. BMC Medical Ethics, 21(1), 1-10.
The article argues that considering that Healthcare practitioners and physicians in Korea have been forbidden from legally and ethically engaging in abortions for many years, setting up a universal legal obligation may be haring those doctors who chose this profession when abortion was illegal. In other words, even if conscientious objection s issued as a constitutional right, there will be little patients accepting abortion since most of them get treatment by a doctor who they have prior information. The article concludes by indicating that based on abortion services sought in the coming years, medical health professionals, especially doctors, should be issued the legal obligating and constitutional right to conduct conscientious objection based on the significance of the doctor’s moral integrity, government responsibility, and lack of impediment to patients.
References
Kim, C. J. (2020). Conscientious objection to abortion: why it should be a specified legal right for doctors in South Korea. BMC Medical Ethics, 21(1), 1-10.
Fetrow, K. L. (2018). Taking Abortion Rights Seriously: Toward a Holistic Undue Burden Jurisprudence. Stan. L. Rev., 70, 319.
Ziegler, M. (2020). Abortion in America: Roe v. Wade to the Present. Cambridge University Press
Fiala, A. (2019). Legal But Rare: Toward a Transformative Critical Theory of Abortion and Unwanted Pregnancy. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 33(2), 203-220.
Tasset, J., & Harris, L. H. (2018). Harm reduction for abortion in the United States. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 131(4), 621-624.
Blackshaw, B. P., & Rodger, D. (2020). Questionable benefits and unavoidable personal beliefs: defending conscientious objection for abortion. Journal of Medical Ethics, 46(3), 178-182.
Levine, P. B. (2004). Abortion policy and the economics of fertility. Society, 41(4), 79-85.
Mølland, E. (2016). Benefits from delay? The effect of abortion availability on young women and their children. Labor Economics, 43, 6-28.