What is the Central image, and how does it work in “Anecdote of a Jar?” What does it symbolize, and how is it a modernist idea? There are numerous sounds in the Anecdote of the Jar, but the round is what the readers hear in the poem. As the sound of the round would seem to overpower the poem when we focus on it — whereas when we read from a curvature — that is, our perception that the jar directives the wilderness depends on our momentary adoption of the jar’s point of view. By interpreting it through its own viewpoint, the jar commands the wilderness by projecting its own form, letting the wilderness cover it. But one must remember here that the wilderness is not controlled, just the edge surrounding the jar that has been made round (given shape). That is, a conceptual order is an order placed by the container. The wilderness is no longer wild, exotic, from the jar; this has been described and evaluated to be familiar with the jar. But to take some other view than that of the jar is to see how the wilderness is not modified in any realistic way; it will accept the arbitrary nature of the order, while the poem ultimately implies.
As Frank Lentricchia has stated recently, the topic of perspective is crucial to the poem. In contrast, Lentricchia’s point of view — he cares to read it as an anti-colonial anecdote — may not permit him to explore the question in its entirety. In “Anecdote of the Jar”, he states that the perspective is primarily “panoramic,” although restricted to two main issues. Readers view reality at first “as per a jar, declining to retain the confident perception about its own excellently-formed self to its own, pompously accepting itself as the distribution point of clarification and single geological coordination: Readers view the wilderness coerced into order on its own.” throughout the conclusion, “The readers encounter the perspective of the wilderness throughout the context that the panoramic narrator holds the wilderness side.”
- Both “Thirteen Ways of looking a Blackbird and “Disillusionment of Ten O’clock” deal with the idea of perception and subjectively. What other similarities do you see? What are the major differences in how this idea presented?
Similarities
Thirteen Ways of Looking a Blackbird and Disillusionment of Ten O’clock are both poetry of Wallace Stevens. Both poems deal with perspectives where every individual has his or her point of view on a subject. In the Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird, the bird in the poem takes much wild interpretation as the audience dive deep into the poem. The poetry is more about conveying the audience’s certain emotions than presenting some exact point regarding birds. Conclude. However, the poem indicates that truth is often a question of interpretation, where each views reality in their manner and recognizes it. In Ten O’clock’s disillusionment, the poet does not share what the poem is, but what is not creating disillusionment is similar to Thirteen Ways of Looking a Blackbird, where the individual perceives the information on his or her own.
Differences
“Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird” is poetry deeply rooted in the physical world, but with numerous distinct viewpoints, as the title implies. The poem provides several “sensations” (Stevens’ original word) regarding the physical world when it passes across its thirteen short sections, showing how existence is not just a single thing. It can be awe-inspiring, fearful, beautiful, massive, and fragile all at the same time. On the other hand, the disillusionment of Ten O’clock, the poem, if it functions, helps the audience reach into the imagination. The individual seems to be the amount of his position and time for Stevens. The poetry encourages the audience to connect according to their drunken sailor, to discover oneself flamboyantly later than 10 in a vibrant nightgown, a set of vintage lace socks, and bedtime.