Student’s Name
Professor
Course Title
Date of Submission
The Handmaid’s Tale Gender Analysis
“The Handmaid’s Tale,” involves a general public where ladies are restricted to their privileges. A noteworthy aspect of the female people has gotten sterile. In this way, the Gilead society’s top-notch has decided to effectively appoint several women who are up ’til now prepared to shoulder kids as Handmaids to repopulate the nation. The ones who are as, nonetheless, ready to have children are given the decision of ending up being handmaids or persevere through a considerably more awful fate; destruction or being delivered off live among the ladies, which is what Gilead society calls women who can’t become pregnant anymore. Such ladies are constrained to live under slave-like conditions while tying up destructive materials that will, in the end, hurt them and butcher them. Besides, the peril of violence ceaselessly lingers over Gilead’s inhabitants, especially the Handmaids. This essay will analyze how gender inequality and sexual violence shape the novel’s characters through gender sociological perspectives.
Atwood is eminent for her ladies’ extremist viewpoints, but she is rarely biased and raises issues rather than merely asserting her perspectives. Her comments, “if Moira thought she could create Utopia by shutting herself up in a woman-only enclave she was sadly mistaken. Men were not just going to go away,” portrays women as the essential setbacks in the overall population envisioned by Atwood (Atwood 62). Her vision of this broad population reflects substantial differences and abuses, generally considering women beforehand and at present. Gilead has introduced a total lady’s coercion and believes that the dominant males subsume even their character. Moira’s masculine style attire, taboo language, and lesbian proclivities oppose all that Gilead wishes to discover women’s potential. In like manner, a considerable aspect of the story offers a need to Offred to enhance a successive resistance. However, finally, the men rule for their pleasure to make Moira quiet.
Further, Atwood portrays how the film appeared to recommend that females could not experience a happy professional and love life. Atwood (119) argues that Atwood knew that “the notion of sacrifice was accepted… You couldn’t be a wife and mother and also an artist because each one of these things required total dedication.” Offred contends that the overwhelming new regime pardons women who had acquired professions before the Republic of Gilead. This argument, “You can’t work here anymore. It’s the law.” (Atwood 36), is maintained by the men with programmed rifles staying at the entrance. There is no right for women to hold property, and in case it happens, it must be offered over to a male relative’s control. Offred knows how this impacts her affiliation with Luke in his announcement, “We are not each other’s, anymore. Instead, I am his.” (Atwood 142) Offred surveyed her mother’s viewpoints, an earlier lady lobbyist, through her mother’s recollections and through the Aunts’ showing stories of those they call mistreat.
In conclusion, the effects of women’s activist developments represented the overt sensitivity to eliminate sex explicit employment titles. However, Atwood likewise demonstrates how the language had been overwhelmed by male-arranged decisions for quite a long time. Offred remarks that her thoughts on what men may state are an apparent assumption. Atwood uses Offred to demonstrate the intensity of language and of monitoring nuances of significance.
Cited Source
Atwood, Margaret. “The handmaid’s tale and oryx and crake in context.” PmLa 119.3 (2004): 513-517.