Myths and Facts about Arranged Marriages
Myths and misconceptions are many about the family setting. However, such myths are deconstructed by facts and make them unauthentic. The purpose of the research paper will discuss myths of arranged marriage and LBGTQ+families. Westerners pick their own spouses for better for worse. Arranged marriages apply to other cultures across the world. It is a general belief that young adults are emotionally mature and impulsive to pick good mates. Parents, elders and guardians mandated in choosing mates for them who are caring spouses. Besides, their interesting statistics that arranged marriages are the best ones. Nevertheless, LBGTQ myths are interesting when it comes to parenting. For example, it is believed that children of home parental families encounter difficult social relationships with other children. Additionally, it is believed that homosexual people cannot have children, and if they have, they will have limited integration with their extended families than those of heterosexual families. Therefore, the study will discuss two myths in each topic and deconstruct each myth with facts.
It is a myth that arranged marriages happen in third-world countries. There are some interesting instances where arranged marriages occur due to poverty which is associated with third-world countries. Women are forced to marry to bring wealth to the family. Arranged marriages are common among Hindus, Muslims, Amish and some royal families. Arranged marriages occur due to religious or cultural facets.
However, such a myth is inaccurate as they are deconstructed with evidence. It is a fact that dating “resumes” are the thing that occurs between the spouses. Love might be the only concept that people figure out in arranged marriage, but many factors play a significant role. Individual’s socioeconomic class, horoscopes and religion are often considered than physical attractiveness. Majority of involved parties develop a resume or summary of their candidates such as academic, birth and employment.
Some myths arranged marriages are the same depending on the culture and area where parents choose spouses for their children. It is believed that parents, guardians and elders choosing spouses for their beloved children have no say in his or her match. Therefore, it inaccurate that all arranged marriages are the same. In some cultures such as orthodox, parents choose spouses for their children, but the individual consulted has a right of objection. Besides, in consanguineous marriages or marriage of related people are the norm. In a consanguineous marriage, the bride and the groom share ancestral origin such as first cousin marriages ad second cousin marriage. In such a case, some cultures are against it, and others adopt it. In arranged exogamous marriage, the third-party selects bride and groom irrespective of their cultural, economic and social group. In contrast, in arranged endogamous marriage, the selected bride and groom are based on a social, economic and cultural group. Therefore, it inaccurate to believe that all arranged marriages are same as there distinctions between the three types of arranged marriages.
Myths about LGBTQ and Families
It is a myth that homosexual people do not have children. Homosexuality is defined by sexual identity such as lesbians, gays, bisexual and transgender. However, such a myth is inaccurate because LGBTQ can adopt children using modern methods. Such people may have children that were conceived in previous heterosexual relationships. Majority of home parental families in the United States comprise of parents who had conceived their children in the previous heterosexual relationships. After divorce, the parents have full custody of such children if such divorced parents decide to join home parental, the new partner assumes the parental role of the children. However, the law does not define such responsibilities.
Homopranetal families can get children through assisted reproduction. LGBTQ families within same-sex conjugal relationships start families. For example, in a lesbian family, the couple or single can visit a fertility clinic that is constituted in the federal law on assisted reproduction. The law prevents fertility clinics from denying people services because of their sexual orientation and civil status. The process allows sperm and egg donors to remain anonymous. Both or one of the lesbian may wish to experience pregnancy.
AT-Home insemination is another for LGBTQ can get a child. Lesbians or single mothers request their acquaintance or friend to donate his sperm. The sperm donor is known in this scenario. It involves the use of a needless syringe, and the donor and the lesbian may frame the role of each person will take in the parenting of the child. Since the law allows two parents to be recognized for the child, the couple or single lesbians and the donor agree to names of the child on the birth certificate.
Co-Parenting occurs when lesbians and gays decide to co-parent the same child. For example, a gay couple and lesbian couple can decide to use at-home insemination and have families. The couples enter an agreement in distributing parental responsibilities among the parties involved. However, LGBT family statistics revealed that such marriages are rare. Adoption of children and fostering practices are alternatives to have children for LGBTQ. Some agencies deal with fostering and are confined within federal laws of human rights.
International adoption tales place across the globe, although it may be difficult for LGBTQ as a majority of international adoptions restrict homosexuals from the practice. Surrogacy whereby gay men may turn into surrogate mother to raise a family. For example, in America, the Federal Assisted Human Reproduction Act restricts payment of surrogate mothers. Therefore, gays find a willing mother to help them. Therefore, from the various types of raising families for GBTG, it is inaccurate that they cannot have children.
Children brought up by LGBTQ families are confused about their gender identity and conventional gender roles. It is a myth that children of gays and lesbians cannot have definite roles in society, such as the development of gender roles and gender identity. However, such children are exposed to positive models, such as education and social integration. Such a myth is inaccurate because gender identity in those children is normal when they perform different activities. Studies show that the development of gender identity of lesbian and gay children was normal compared to those of heterosexual families. Children from both families develop similar gender identities. Besides, gender roles of gay and lesbian children are similar to those of heterosexual parents. There is no distinction on social roles, practices and behaviors, and each behavior was confined to a particular culture. In terms of leisure, there no distinction between toy preferences and their interests. Such children maintain normal stature of feminine and masculinity similar to their peers raised by heterosexual parents.
In conclusion, arranged myths in the society are based on cultural believes but not confined within empirical evidence. Arranged marriages are not the same and are not associated with third-world countries. LGBTQ and families myths are not true, such as childbearing since the facts outshine them.