Obama’s speech
Speeches often occur when someone is asked or decides to say a few words or give a toast on a special occasion. Speech can be referred to as an individual’s fashioned thoughts delivered to an audience either directly or indirectly (Harwood and Rasmussen, 2013). A speech is carefully prepared for presentation. A person delivering one needs to consider the best method, the audience, and the type of presentation, whereby the different methods are appropriate in certain situations. A person may at times be faced by a situation where he may not be prepared and has to rely on what he or she knows, while at other times, one may be required to present a speech that he or she is well prepared for and has practiced (Harwood and Rasmussen, 2013). Notably, substantial work goes into careful preparation of an ethical and exciting speech. moreove4r, speaking in public has more formality than talking (Harwood and Rasmussen, 2013). Barrack Obama, who has been a vital figure in the United States, politics, economy, and social strata, has delivered many extemporaneous speeches regarding the wellness of humanity, and the moves that can be taken to impact the overall development of the whole world (Obama, 2007). His barnstorming speech in “The Audacity of Hope” has been a significant reference to most seasoned observers of American politics, where he presents himself as a significant phenomenon in the political domain.
Obama bases his speech on his bid for presidential candidacy. His ability to connect with an audience has sparked remarkable comparisons with other previous public figures in United States history (Obama, 2007). His delivery style makes his audience consider him a friend, with his exciting mood dictating more about America’s public. Considerably, this speech, among others, has played a significant part in promoting his presidential bid, which was later met with high enthusiasm and warmth (Obama, 2007). The speech offers its audience a window, not just into the minds of one of America’s most exciting politician, but also into the political landscape of the post bush era.
Conversely, his argument on the partisan bitterness characterizes American politics for about two decades ago, which is hedonistic and unnecessary (Obama, 2007). The speech provides an insightful deduction that, based on activism, the Democratic and the Republican party leaders have alienated millions of ordinary Americans from politics at the time when decisive political decisions are needed the most (Obama, 2007). Obama maintains that the minuteness of the country’s politics and the magnitude of people’s challenges is the main trouble that has been affecting the United States political domain (Obama, 2007).
Furthermore, Obama argues that politicians need to abandon the rhetoric of the “culture war” and focus on the modest everyday concerns and aspirations of the larger American population, to earn their legitimacy (Obama, 2007). He adds that politicians also require a different way of addressing arising issues, but not only identifying more different sets of issues (Obama, 2007). His speech regularly brings up the aspect of the need for a new kind of politics, which broadens his audience’s perspectives of the real political structure and functionality in the United States.
Conclusion
In summation, Obama’s speech can be said to be matching the lofty heights of his oratory, with an engaging and fluid engagement of his target audience. He can weave together the anecdotal and personal with the conceptual and political. His points seem to be both commonsensical and persuasive, which altogether played a vital role in his later achieved success as a president-elect of the United States. His multilateralism perspective in the speech helps all citizens to reflect on the modern democratic worldview.